Search Shoe Comic Strip
Search MacNelly Editorials

Treetops Tattler Archives

« prev    1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23    next »

Ticket to Ride - With a Few Extras

By Perfesser Cosmo Fishhawk,
Aug. 12th, 2010

e-mail this article to a friend
The Treetops Tattler [RSS]
Click to share this post on Facebook
Click to share this post on Twitter

Airlines used to focus on safety, comfort and drink carts for those in the seats. But nowadays the carriers in the friendly skies are stacked up inventing new and better fees to enhance the flying experience.

“Think about those moving walkways in the airports, the ones that get you from Terminal A to Terminal C,” said Amelia Noheart, spokeswoman for the Novel Airline Fees Trade Association (NAFTA).

“Why should the airlines have to pay for that? We see a simple toll-booth system being put in place for the moving sidewalks.”

Airline analysts are also considering a system in which passengers would be charged extra for not wearing slip-on shoes while going through gate security. continued »

“It’s a total time waster,” said Ms. Noheart. “We believe charging people for that would actually benefit the consumer.”

In the future, passengers may be charged for a second trip to the bathroom on domestic flights.

“Pretty simple, really,” said Noheart. “One bio break if it’s less than two hours in the air. A maximum of three on, say, a New York to LA flight. We’re still working out the fee structure.”

The airlines, Noheart says, are demonstrating innovation in the global marketplace:

“Some airlines are already charging for getting a seat assignment and – this is my favorite – a couple of them are charging a fee if you use airline miles, don’t take the flight and want to put the miles back in your frequent-flyer account.

“Hey, even the credit card companies can’t top that.”

Rating: 3.5/5 (28 votes cast)

I'm Going to the Limo - Cover Me

By Perfesser Cosmo Fishhawk,
Aug. 9th, 2010

e-mail this article to a friend
The Treetops Tattler [RSS]
Click to share this post on Facebook
Click to share this post on Twitter

Some of the most prominent residents of an island in the North Atlantic Ocean called Manhattan have recently acquired licenses to carry concealed weapons.

Fox News chief Roger Ailes and one of his best-known political commentators, Sean Hannity, are on a growing list of marquee city dwellers with permits to tote their firearms under wraps.

The roster includes syndicated radio pottymouth Howard Stern, grizzled yakker Don Imus, multi-decade real estate annoyance Donald Trump and his son – yep – Donald Jr.

“There is a clear and present danger to these men,” said William H. Bonney IV, national spokesperson for the Association of Rich Guys with Guns Hidden (ARGGH). continued »

“One of these gentlemen could easily come under attack while walking to the limo from their multi-million dollar townhouse apartments in Manhattan. Of course the weekend getaway places in Connecticut, the Hamptons or the sprawling ranches in the Southwest – it’s practically the Alamo. You have to be sympathetic.”

Trend watchers say concealed weapons permits have joined Rolex watches and leased private jets as status symbols of the post-Wall Street meltdown.

And it’s not just for the rich and famous. In Virginia, so-called “open carry” is all the rage. Bronco-busting car salesman and building contractors apparently in fear for their lives now amble around suburban restaurants packing heat.

In Arizona, where every dog over three months of age must have a license, no permit is required for concealed weapons.

“Of course not,” Bonney said. “Dogs are dangerous.”

Rating: 4.0/5 (25 votes cast)

New-Era Feministas angered over separate but equal dorms rooms, bathrooms, and clothing lines

By Perfesser Cosmo Fishhawk,
Aug. 8th, 2010

e-mail this article to a friend
The Treetops Tattler [RSS]
Click to share this post on Facebook
Click to share this post on Twitter

Following Federal Judge Vaughn Walker’s landmark overturning of Proposition 8, a notable California civil rights organization is speaking out to end another injustice.

The Sacramento-based feminist committee Women for Advancement beyond Nighties and the Kitchen (W.A.N.K.) recently organized their 2010 “Annual March on Wherever” (to take place sometime between next Tuesday and next Thursday’s TBS Sex and the City marathon) to push forward their fourth, fifth, and sixth wave agendas.

W.A.N.K.’s spokeswoman Ariel Morganstein laid out the agenda set forth by self-styled “Howlin’ Feministas”: continued »

“Over four decades after the noisy death of racial segregation, the people of this country still hold true to the archaic, chauvinistic social model of ‘separate but equal.’ I’m talking about the overtly sexist notion of these ‘separate but equal’ bathrooms and gender-specific clothing lines.”

The group’s focus is to make most things in the United States “gender neutral,” including restrooms, changing rooms, and even individual college dorm rooms. W.A.N.K. strongly opposes the distinction between male and female coeds, stating that, “it is our organization’s position that the gender-based gerrymandering of dorm halls is both undesirable and misogynistic. As far as we know, the men’s dorms could have better cooling systems!”

When asked what a perfect, post-sexist America would look like, Morganstein told The Treetops Tattler the following:

“I have a dream that in a new, vibrant America, all boys and girls will proudly wear the same ecru cargo slacks, all businessmen and businesswomen will freely wear the same tar-black ties, and that, God willing, men and women and boys and girls, no matter their creed, color, or hair style, will all be eroding urinal cakes side-by-side, once and for all!”

Rating: 2.4/5 (7 votes cast)

American Idol - You be the Judge

By Perfesser Cosmo Fishhawk,
Aug. 4th, 2010

e-mail this article to a friend
The Treetops Tattler [RSS]
Click to share this post on Facebook
Click to share this post on Twitter

The nation is clutching its Red Bull in anticipation of a new judge on Fox’s “American Idol.”

Lately, the judging lineup for “Idol” has been as hard to follow as the interviews with the contestants. Paula Abdul left, reportedly to manage a school for 48-year-old cheerleaders. The cranky English guy has returned to his homeland, where he’ll reportedly run a tough-love nursing home.

Now ditsy daytime talk show host Ellen DeGeneres is moving on.

“We were a little confused about Ellen’s sudden disappearance,” said ”Idol” blogger expert LaVar Gleeclub. “It was kinda like those Russian spies in New Jersey. Where’d she go?” continued »

Last week millions of Americans took a break from staring at Ted Danson, the only Hollywood celebrity at Chelsea Clinton’s wedding, to consider the possibility that wrinkly rocker Steven Tyler might take Ellen’s spot.

“Steven is perfect, if you think a 62-year-old rocker is the way to go,” said Gleeclub. “He looks like Larry King these days.”

Gleeclub said fans were excited about the Jennifer Lopez rumors: “We’re not sure there’s enough bad singing on the show to save her career, though.

“We were hoping they’d ask John Roberts, the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. If not him, then maybe Judge Judy, from cable. And what about Ted Danson? What’s he doing these days?”

Gleeclub thinks the other side of the criminal justice system could provide “Idol” with its next arbiter of warbling talent.

“Think about that Rod Blagojevich guy,” he said. “OK, he’s got no talent. That makes it perfect.”

Rating: 3.6/5 (44 votes cast)

Rescue ME, Not my Wallet

By Perfesser Cosmo Fishhawk,
Jul. 30th, 2010

e-mail this article to a friend
The Treetops Tattler [RSS]
Click to share this post on Facebook
Click to share this post on Twitter

Some Members of Congress want to set aside a pool of taxpayer money for the rescue of globetrotting rich kids and idle Internet millionaires who seem to be getting lost with alarming frequency.

Word that a 14-year-old Dutch girl is about to set off on another solo sailboat trek around the globe has energized the Congressional Yachting and Balloon Caucus.

Just last month, a 16-year-old California girl was rescued on her sailboat in the far reaches of the Indian Ocean. Speaking on a morning talk show, her Dad pointed out that when it came to international search and rescue, he had no intention of paying a dime for anything. continued »

“These adventures cost money, people,” said Ahab W. Mizzenmast, staff director of the Caucus (CYBC). “And some people think the families of these world-travelers should pay for their own rescues. Outrageous.”

Mizzenmast acknowledges that many people wonder who foots the bill to rescue that becalmed teenage sailor or rich guy in the balloon who disappeared on his ninth attempt to circumnavigate the globe.

“You do, my friend,” he said. “The Coast Guard, the Navy and all the ships at sea, plus nice people who go looking for those aging software billionaires who disappear in the Andes or the Baja in their hot-air balloons.”

The CYBC would earmark funds so that the cost of these rescues would be spread around to taxpayers without causing any stress to those wealthy folks with a sense of derring-do and too much time on their hands.

Rating: 3.5/5 (31 votes cast)

« prev    1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23    next »
Shoe Store
send a message to the editor
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement